{
  "schema": "ARBD-B28-EDGE-MAPPING-REVIEW-v1",
  "mapping_author": "Build 28 implementation editorial candidate; independent review not performed",
  "policy": "Unlisted edge types are retained in legacy_edges; no nearest-type guessing. Mapped edges are conceptual relations, not licensed inference rules.",
  "mappings": {
    "DEPENDS_ON_PURE_INTUITION_CANDIDATE": {"edge_type": "DEPENDS_ON", "reason": "The legacy type explicitly states the direction of dependency; candidate status is retained."},
    "REQUIRES_PUBLIC_REASON": {"edge_type": "DEPENDS_ON", "reason": "Requires maps to a dependency of the source on the target, subject to textual review."},
    "SUPPORTS_CRITICAL_TRUTH_FIREWALL": {"edge_type": "SUPPORTS", "reason": "Explicit supports relation; this is an interpretive link, not a claim that Kant proved KLT."},
    "CONDITIONS_CATEGORY_OBJECTIVITY": {"edge_type": "SUPPORTS", "reason": "Source is proposed as a condition of the target; conceptual support only."},
    "JURIDICAL_DOMAIN_REFINES_FREEDOM": {"edge_type": "REFINES", "reason": "Explicitly domain-restricted refinement; no identification of all senses of freedom."},
    "INSTITUTIONAL_REFINEMENT_OF_PUBLIC_REASON": {"edge_type": "REFINES", "reason": "Explicit refinement keeps the institutional scope."},
    "POLITICAL_INSTANTIATION_OF_PUBLIC_REASON": {"edge_type": "REFINES", "reason": "A proposed political instance refines the broader candidate, pending scope review."},
    "PARTITIONS_MORALS_EXTERNAL_RIGHT": {"edge_type": "GENERALIZES", "reason": "The broader system of morals contains the right branch; no identity is asserted."},
    "PARTITIONS_MORALS_INTERNAL_ETHICS": {"edge_type": "GENERALIZES", "reason": "The broader system of morals contains the ethics branch; no identity is asserted."},
    "FEDERATION_AS_INTERSTATE_JURIDICAL_BRANCH": {"edge_type": "REFINES", "reason": "The interstate branch is recorded as a domain refinement."},
    "GROUNDS_CIVIL_RIGHT_PRINCIPLES": {"edge_type": "SUPPORTS", "reason": "Grounding is projected to conceptual support, with no formal derivation license."},
    "EVIDENCE_SCHEME_FOR_PROGRESS": {"edge_type": "SUPPORTS", "reason": "A proposed evidence scheme supports a progress candidate only within its declared historical scope."}
  },
  "truth_layer_promotion": 0
}
