{
  "cases": [
    {
      "candidate_ids": [
        "KANT-AR-011",
        "KANT-AR-014"
      ],
      "conflict_id": "KANT-C-001",
      "direct_unresolved": false,
      "inherited_formal_review": {
        "class_id": "FCC-02",
        "contradiction_id": "KANT-C-001",
        "modality_test": "MODALITY_COMPATIBLE_AFTER_DOMAIN_SPLIT",
        "repair_or_resolution_gate": "Retain mediation/domain audit; do not collapse nature and freedom.",
        "same_dom_test": "FAIL_SAME_DOM: nature/theoretical and freedom/practical legislations are distinguished",
        "temporal_test": "NO_DECISIVE_TEMPORAL_CONFLICT",
        "verdict": "NOT_DIRECT_CONTRADICTION_RUN009"
      },
      "left": {
        "kind": "CANDIDATE",
        "ref": "KANT-AR-011"
      },
      "legacy_payload": {
        "author_id": "AUTH-0664a4f33ff06dc6",
        "contradiction_id": "KANT-C-001",
        "contradiction_type": "APPARENT_NATURE_FREEDOM_TENSION",
        "left_ref": "KANT-AR-011",
        "resolution_gate": "AA V 195 explicitly distinguishes nature/theoretical and freedom/practical legislations and frames judgment as connection/mediation; retain REVIEW until whole-corpus same-Dom test is complete.",
        "right_ref": "KANT-AR-014",
        "status": "TEXTUALLY_SUPPORTED_MEDIATION_CANDIDATE"
      },
      "resolution_gate": "AA V 195 explicitly distinguishes nature/theoretical and freedom/practical legislations and frames judgment as connection/mediation; retain REVIEW until whole-corpus same-Dom test is complete.",
      "right": {
        "kind": "CANDIDATE",
        "ref": "KANT-AR-014"
      },
      "status": "TENSION_REVIEW",
      "truth_layer_promotion": 0
    },
    {
      "candidate_ids": [
        "KANT-AR-004",
        "KANT-AR-011"
      ],
      "conflict_id": "KANT-C-002",
      "direct_unresolved": false,
      "inherited_formal_review": {
        "class_id": "FCC-02",
        "contradiction_id": "KANT-C-002",
        "modality_test": "DIFFERENT_USE_MODALITIES",
        "repair_or_resolution_gate": "Maintain theoretical/practical split and term-sense audit for freedom.",
        "same_dom_test": "FAIL_SAME_DOM: theoretical cognition limit vs practical use/reality of freedom",
        "temporal_test": "NO_DECISIVE_TEMPORAL_CONFLICT",
        "verdict": "NOT_DIRECT_CONTRADICTION_RUN009"
      },
      "left": {
        "kind": "CANDIDATE",
        "ref": "KANT-AR-004"
      },
      "legacy_payload": {
        "author_id": "AUTH-0664a4f33ff06dc6",
        "contradiction_id": "KANT-C-002",
        "contradiction_type": "APPARENT_LIMIT_VS_PRACTICAL_REALITY_TENSION",
        "left_ref": "KANT-AR-004",
        "resolution_gate": "AA V 4 and AA V 29-31 support theoretical/practical use-domain separation for freedom; retain REVIEW until whole-corpus term-sense and A/B alignment are complete.",
        "right_ref": "KANT-AR-011",
        "status": "TEXTUALLY_SUPPORTED_DOMAIN_SPLIT_CANDIDATE"
      },
      "resolution_gate": "AA V 4 and AA V 29-31 support theoretical/practical use-domain separation for freedom; retain REVIEW until whole-corpus term-sense and A/B alignment are complete.",
      "right": {
        "kind": "CANDIDATE",
        "ref": "KANT-AR-011"
      },
      "status": "TENSION_REVIEW",
      "truth_layer_promotion": 0
    },
    {
      "candidate_ids": [
        "KANT-AR-025"
      ],
      "conflict_id": "KANT-C-003",
      "direct_unresolved": false,
      "inherited_formal_review": {
        "class_id": "FCC-06",
        "contradiction_id": "KANT-C-003",
        "modality_test": "DIFFERENT_LEVELS_OF_PREDICATION",
        "repair_or_resolution_gate": "Keep species-character level distinction explicit.",
        "same_dom_test": "FAIL_SAME_LEVEL: intelligible predisposition vs sensible propensity",
        "temporal_test": "NO_DECISIVE_TEMPORAL_CONFLICT",
        "verdict": "NOT_DIRECT_CONTRADICTION_RUN009"
      },
      "left": {
        "kind": "SOURCE_ANCHOR",
        "ref": "AA07:324:INTELLIGIBLE_GOOD"
      },
      "legacy_payload": {
        "author_id": "AUTH-0664a4f33ff06dc6",
        "contradiction_id": "KANT-C-003",
        "contradiction_type": "APPARENT_GOOD_EVIL_SPECIES_CHARACTER_TENSION",
        "left_ref": "AA07:324:INTELLIGIBLE_GOOD",
        "resolution_gate": "AA VII 324 explicitly distinguishes intelligible moral predisposition to good from sensible propensity to evil; retain as a domain/character distinction, not a resolved whole-corpus contradiction.",
        "right_ref": "KANT-AR-025",
        "status": "TEXTUALLY_EXPLICIT_DOMAIN_DISTINCTION_CANDIDATE"
      },
      "resolution_gate": "AA VII 324 explicitly distinguishes intelligible moral predisposition to good from sensible propensity to evil; retain as a domain/character distinction, not a resolved whole-corpus contradiction.",
      "right": {
        "kind": "CANDIDATE",
        "ref": "KANT-AR-025"
      },
      "status": "TENSION_REVIEW",
      "truth_layer_promotion": 0
    },
    {
      "candidate_ids": [
        "KANT-AR-035",
        "KANT-AR-043"
      ],
      "conflict_id": "KANT-C-004",
      "direct_unresolved": false,
      "inherited_formal_review": {
        "class_id": "FCC-03",
        "contradiction_id": "KANT-C-004",
        "modality_test": "CAUSAL_ROLE_VS_EVIDENTIAL_ROLE",
        "repair_or_resolution_gate": "Maintain object-role typing; fuller context audit remains open.",
        "same_dom_test": "FAIL_SAME_ROLE: revolution as reform mechanism vs revolution/event-response as sign",
        "temporal_test": "CHRONOLOGY_RELEVANT_BUT_NOT_SUFFICIENT",
        "verdict": "NOT_DIRECT_CONTRADICTION_RUN009"
      },
      "left": {
        "kind": "CANDIDATE",
        "ref": "KANT-AR-035"
      },
      "legacy_payload": {
        "author_id": "AUTH-0664a4f33ff06dc6",
        "contradiction_id": "KANT-C-004",
        "contradiction_type": "APPARENT_REVOLUTION_ROLE_TENSION",
        "left_ref": "KANT-AR-035",
        "resolution_gate": "Distinguish revolution as insufficient causal mechanism of reform in ways of thinking (Aufklärung) from revolution/event-response as historical sign in predictive history (Streit). Do not mark RESOLVED until fuller context audit.",
        "right_ref": "KANT-AR-043",
        "status": "TEXTUALLY_SUPPORTED_OBJECT_ROLE_DISTINCTION_CANDIDATE"
      },
      "resolution_gate": "Distinguish revolution as insufficient causal mechanism of reform in ways of thinking (Aufklärung) from revolution/event-response as historical sign in predictive history (Streit). Do not mark RESOLVED until fuller context audit.",
      "right": {
        "kind": "CANDIDATE",
        "ref": "KANT-AR-043"
      },
      "status": "TENSION_REVIEW",
      "truth_layer_promotion": 0
    },
    {
      "candidate_ids": [
        "KANT-AR-051",
        "KANT-AR-044"
      ],
      "conflict_id": "KANT-C-005",
      "direct_unresolved": false,
      "inherited_formal_review": {
        "class_id": "FCC-04",
        "contradiction_id": "KANT-C-005",
        "modality_test": "PRACTICAL_ORIENTATION_VS_EMPIRICAL_EVIDENCE",
        "repair_or_resolution_gate": "Complete proposition-level chronology and evidence-level audit before any contradiction verdict.",
        "same_dom_test": "SAME_TOPIC_BUT_EVIDENCE_DOMAINS_DIFFER",
        "temporal_test": "1793_TO_1798_REFINEMENT_CANDIDATE",
        "verdict": "UNRESOLVED_REFINEMENT_NOT_DIRECT_CONTRADICTION"
      },
      "left": {
        "kind": "CANDIDATE",
        "ref": "KANT-AR-051"
      },
      "legacy_payload": {
        "author_id": "AUTH-0664a4f33ff06dc6",
        "contradiction_id": "KANT-C-005",
        "contradiction_type": "APPARENT_PROGRESS_EVIDENCE_CRITERION_TENSION",
        "left_ref": "KANT-AR-051",
        "resolution_gate": "Compare TP 1793 claims/hope about moral progress with Streit 1798 distinction between observable legality and inner moral disposition. Do not mark RESOLVED until proposition-level chronological/domain audit.",
        "right_ref": "KANT-AR-044",
        "status": "TEXTUAL_CHRONOLOGICAL_REFINEMENT_CANDIDATE_REVIEW"
      },
      "resolution_gate": "Compare TP 1793 claims/hope about moral progress with Streit 1798 distinction between observable legality and inner moral disposition. Do not mark RESOLVED until proposition-level chronological/domain audit.",
      "right": {
        "kind": "CANDIDATE",
        "ref": "KANT-AR-044"
      },
      "status": "TENSION_REVIEW",
      "truth_layer_promotion": 0
    }
  ],
  "logical_scan": {
    "direct_pairs": [],
    "engine_scope": "REVIEWED_GROUND_LITERALS_ONLY",
    "full_logical_consistency": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
    "pair_count": 1711,
    "truth_layer_promotion": 0,
    "verdict_counts": {
      "ABSTAIN_NONASSERTIVE": 58,
      "ABSTAIN_UNSUPPORTED_LOGICAL_FORM": 1653
    }
  },
  "truth_layer_promotion": 0
}
